247bbd059b7c7484aadc41d572a6ce0a
Re: Proposed Reval warrant question
- From
- Danielle Bradbury <[email protected]>
- To
- Mike Harnois <[email protected]>
- Date
It sounds good to me but I’d defer to our attorney as well just to make sure we cover all the bases. Thanks Mike!
Danielle
On 2026-07-20 13:58, Mike Harnois wrote: > Hi all, > > I understand that at the special time meeting, the question can be > discussed in depth. But as we are trying get this out there and the > warrant will be on the website before the vote, I propose we write a > question as if it was on a secret ballot (with note). > > Here is how I would write (edits welcome and can be discussed on > Thursday). I would also ask Dick or Roger to have Ben review before > Thursday to make sure there is no advocacy in the language. > > Article 1: Shall the Town vote to appropriate up to $265,000 from the > Town’s existing Unassigned/Operation Fund Balance, which consists of > funds the Town already holds and requires no new taxes to be raised, > to conduct a town-wide revaluation of real property? > > Note: Hollis has not conducted a full revaluation since 2000, > twenty-six years ago. Maine law requires municipalities to maintain > assessments at fair market value, and the Town’s assessment current > ratio (2026 TY predicted at 52%) has fallen well below state > standards. A revaluation corrects inequities between properties that > have appreciated at different rates. It does not, by itself, increase > the total taxes the Town collects. This article will not raise > property taxes; it spends money already in the Town’s fund balance. > > Select Board Recommends. Finance Committee Recommends (they recommend > the last question, but we may need to leave this off because it has > changed (slightly). > > Please don't reply all. > > As a reminder, I will not be able to attend Thursday in person or > online. > > Thanks, > > Mike